Legal Opinion

Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Progressive Mountain Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 30, 2001No. 99SC836PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hobbs

The Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (No-Fault Act) permits auto insurers to offer a "named driver exelusion" on certain insurance policies. Where an individual's driving record justifies the cancellation or nonrenewal of a policy, the insurer shall instead offer to exclude that individual from all *344coverage on the policy and retain coverage for the remaining drivers. See § 10-4-721, 3 C.R.S. (2000). We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Principal Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Progressive Mountain Insurance Co., 1 P.3d 250 (Colo.App.1999), to determine whether…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Unigard Security Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. DeHerrera Ex Rel. DeHerrera v. Sentry Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Regional Transportation District v. VossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DeHerrera Ex Rel. DeHerrera v. Sentry Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  2. Massingill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Castaneda v. Progressive Classic InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2003
  4. Massingill v. STATE FARM MUT. AUT. INS. CO.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Principal Mut. Ins. v. Progress. Mtn. Ins.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API