Legal Opinion

Principal Mut. Ins. v. Progress. Mtn. Ins.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 30, 2001No. 99SC836Published

1Opinion of the Court

27 P.3d 343 (2001)

PRINCIPAL MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Iowa corporation; and City Market, Inc., a Colorado corporation, Petitioners,

v.

PROGRESSIVE MOUNTAIN INSURANCE COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, Respondent.

No. 99SC836.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

April 30, 2001.

Antonio Bates Bernard, P.C., John L. Wheeler, Denver, CO, Attorney for Petitioners.

White and Steele, P.C., Frederick W. Klann, Keith R. Olivera, Denver, CO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Justice HOBBS delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The Colorado Auto Accident Reparations Act (No-Fault Act) permits auto insurers to offer a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Travelers Indemnity Company v. BarnesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  3. Unigard Security Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 1978
  4. DeHerrera Ex Rel. DeHerrera v. Sentry Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
  5. Regional Transportation District v. VossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API