Legal Opinion

Special Indemnity Fund of the Oklahoma v. Hull

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1962No. 39740PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

Under review in this proceeding is the trial tribunal’s order commuting into a *163lump-sum one-fourth of unmatured benefits under an accumulative award against the Special Indemnity Fund (designated in this opinion as the Fund).

Claimant was adjudged on March 23, 1961 to be permanently totally disabled from the cumulative effect of his pre-exist-ing impairments, considered in combination with the last accidental injury. He recovered an award against the Fund for the sum of $9,239.17 (500 weeks at $30.00 per week, or $15,000.00, less the sum of $5,760.-00 paid by the last employer…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bond Marble & Tile Office v. RoseSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Cole Spurgeon Drilling Company v. ParrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  3. Bethlehem Supply Co. v. LeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. LaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. LitterellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  3. Special Indemnity Fund v. LaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. LaxtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API