Legal Opinion · Dissent

Special Indemnity Fund v. Laxton

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 30, 1965No. 40942Published

1DissentWilliams, Justice

It is my strong conviction that three distinct legal concepts are directly involved in determining the true meaning of the statutes applicable to the situation in this case. The first is the concept of commutation of an award to a lump sum, as urged by petitioner, Special Indemnity Fund. In this connection it is to be noted that the last paragraph of 85 O.S.1961 § 172, states as follows:

“Provided, that whenever an injured person receives an award in excess of Seven Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($7,500.00), payable out of the Special Indemnity Fund, said injured employee, for good cause…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Walton, Mayor v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Bd. of Com'rs of Creek v. Alexander, St. TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Hunter v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. FarmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  5. Special Indemnity Fund v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API