Legal Opinion

Carroll v. Nanomech, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided January 10, 2022No. 5:21-cv-05150Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FAYETTEVILLE DIVISION DANIEL CARROLL and KENT SCHOOL CORPORATION PLAINTIFFS v. No. 5:21-CV-05150 NANOMECH, INC., et al. DEFENDANTS OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are two motions. Defendant Nanomech, Inc. filed a motion (Doc. 31) to dismiss Plaintiffs Daniel Carroll and Kent School Corporation’s first amended complaint (Doc. 27). Plaintiffs filed no response, but instead filed a second amended complaint without leave of Court. Because Plaintiffs had previously filed an amended complaint as a matter of course pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Arthur Gallagher v. City of ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. Marlar v. DanielSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API