Legal Opinion
Honda Power Equipment Manufacturing, Inc. v. Woodhouse
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 22, 2003No. CIV. 00-2847(RJL)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LEON, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Honda Power Equipment Manufacturing, Inc.’s (“Honda”), moves for default judgment against the defendants, Timothy C. Woodhouse (“Woodhouse”) and Stephen R. Tickner (“Tickner”). Honda and the defendants have been engaged in a prolonged patent dispute, both in the United States and in the United Kingdom, over a patent for an “Engine Lubrication System.”
In its motion for default judgment, Honda asks this Court to declare defendants’ patent invalid, to hold that Honda has not infringed defendants’ patent,1 and to enjoin defendants from…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- John C. Keegel v. Key West & Caribbean Trading Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Meadows v. Dominican RepublicCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund v. RW Amrine Drywall Co., Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Home Port Rentals, Inc. v. RubenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Partridge v. Am. Hosp. Mgmt. Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- Laster v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Alexian Brothers Medical Center v. Kathleen SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Estate of Gaither v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Cintec International Ltd. v. ParkesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.