Legal Opinion

Cintec International Ltd. v. Parkes

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided July 5, 2006No. Civ.03-2393(RJL)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

(June 29th 2006) [# 37]

LEON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs filed the complaint in the instant action on November 19, 2003, seek ing declaratory judgment that plaintiffs’ devices do not infringe defendant’s patents and that certain claims of one of defendant’s patents are invalid, void or unenforceable, seeking a permanent injunction against defendant, and seeking damages due to unfair competition and false representation by the defendant. Defendant answered and filed a counter-claim alleging infringement of two of the defendant’s patents by the plaintiffs. Presently…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm Beech David Nathaniel Jackson v. Malcolm BeechCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  2. H. F. Livermore Corporation v. Aktiengesellschaft Gebruder LoepfeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  3. Combs v. Nick Garin TruckingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  4. Honda Power Equipment Manufacturing, Inc. v. WoodhouseDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Law Office G.A. Lambert and Associates v. DavidoffDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Safex Foundation, Inc. v. Safelaunch Ventures LimitedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API