Legal Opinion
Labus v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 6, 1990No. Civ. A. 88-2545(SSB)PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROTMAN, District Judge.
Currently before the court is the motion of defendants for summary judgment. For the reasons stated herein, this motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Plaintiff was employed by defendant Navistar International Transportation Corporation (“Navistar”) from November 3, 1952 to June 30, 1986. He moved through a series of positions, from Retail Salesman, Zone Manager, Branch Manager, to Fleet Account Executive. Plaintiff contends that, starting in 1983 and continuing through 1986, Navistar pursued a course of action to reduce…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Troy v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Lo Bosco v. Kure Engineering Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1995
- Holmin v. TRW, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Fleming v. UPSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.