Legal Opinion

United States v. Natal

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 23, 2017No. Docket Nos. 15-94, 15-1012, 15-1020PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal of judgments of conviction and sentence involving crimes that include arson resulting in death, accessory after the fact to arson, and destruction and concealment of evidence, we write to address three issues:(1) Whether testimony on how cell phone towers operate must be provided by an expert witness rather than a lay witness;(2) Whether defendant Morales’s conviction for destruction and concealment of evidence for re-painting his van must be vacated in light of the Supreme Court’s holding in an intervening decision, Yates v. United States, — U.S. -, 135 S.Ct. 1074, 191 L.Ed.2d…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. CaveraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  3. United States v. GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
  4. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. United States v. RigasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. BolesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. CummingsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. State v. SteeleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. Washington v. Kellwood CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  5. State v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 2022

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API