Legal Opinion

Mora v. Le Roy

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 7,538PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the defendant in the First District Court County of Ventura. Fawcett, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Shakpstein, J.:

This action was originally commenced by the plaintiff’s predecessor, Thaddeus Amat, “ Roman Catholic Bishop of Monterey,” whose death was suggested pending the action, and immediately thereafter the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, in the title of which he is styled plaintiff, and the defendants named in the original complaint and some others are styled defendants. The persons named as defendants in the amended complaint filed an answer thereto. Afterwards the plaintiff filed another and “last amended complaint,” as it is styled, to which the defendants demurred on two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. The Phoenix Bank v. . DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Pierce v. FelterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Bauman v. New-York Central RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1854

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. GoldtreeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Bryant v. WellbanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Le Breton v. Stanley Contracting Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Knight v. Le BeauMontana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Millan v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API