Legal Opinion

Knight v. Le Beau

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Gallatin County. F. K. Armstrong, Judge. Action by J. A. Knight and another, as administrators with the will annexed of the estate of George Henry Godwin, deceased, against Peter Le Beau. From a judgment for plaintiffs on the pleadings, defendant appeals. Statement of the case by the justice delivering the opinion. The paintiffs’ complaint in this action is as follows: “The plaintiffs complain of the defendant, and allege: First.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Gallatin County. F. K. Armstrong, Judge. Action by J. A. Knight and another, as administrators with the will annexed of the estate of George Henry Godwin, deceased, against Peter Le Beau. From a judgment for plaintiffs on the pleadings, defendant appeals. Statement of the case by the justice delivering the opinion. The paintiffs’ complaint in this action is as follows: “The plaintiffs complain of the defendant, and allege: First. That on the 25th day of November 1895, the plaintiffs were duly and legally appointed administrators with the will annexed of the estate…

1Opinion of the CourtBuck, J.

We have before us in this appeal able and elaborate briefs on interesting questions of pleading, and have given the arguments of respective counsel the most careful consideration. Does the complaint state a cause of action? We think it does. It is true that the averments as to the legal capacity of plaintiffs to sue are very defective. Properly the pleading should have shown by direct averment that God-win died leaving a will; that a court of this state (naming it) duly made orders admitting said will to probate, and issuing letters of administration with the will annexed to plaintiffs. See 1…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miller v. LucoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Halleck v. MixerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Debolt v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  4. The Phoenix Bank v. . DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  5. Berkshire v. ShultzIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. LagoniMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Poe v. Sheridan CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Thelen v. VogelMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Lefebure v. BakerMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Northwestern Hardware & Steel Co. v. WinnettMontana Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API