Legal Opinion

Inst. of Range & the Am. Mustang v. Nature Conservancy

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 26, 2018No. 28586PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1.] The Institute of Range and the American Mustang (IRAM) appeals from a summary judgment dismissing its suit against The Nature Conservancy. IRAM sought to void a seventeen-year-old deed of conservation easement and to quiet title to its property.1 IRAM claimed: (1) The Nature Conservancy obtained the deed by fraud; (2) IRAM's president entered into the transaction without corporate authority; and (3) there was a failure of consideration and no meeting of the minds concerning the terms of the easement giving The Nature Conservancy a property interest. We affirm.

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Bordeaux v. Shannon County SchoolsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hughes-Johnson Co. v. Dakota Midland HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. LPN Trust v. Farrar Outdoor Advertising, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. One Star v. Sisters of St. FrancisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. Clancy, Inc. v. Khan Comfort, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Wright v. TempleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API