Weidman v. Phillips
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw; Gage (Chauncey H.), J. Replevin by John S. Weidman against John T. Phillips and Arthur W. Seeley, copartners as Phillips & Seeley. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendants on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The defendants have appealed from a judgment against them, based on an alleged wrongful conversion of certain lumber.
The plaintiff owned and operated a sawmill and lumbering business at Weidman, Isabella county, Mich. The Ross Bros., consisting of William and Ronald Ross, were engaged in a similar business at Beaverton, Gladwin county. Defendants are lumber dealers, with offices at Saginaw. The plaintiff’s claim is based on the following testimony, which we find it necessary to give somewhat at length, in order that the case be well understood. The plaintiff testified that on the 23d day of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Skinner v. Michigan Hoop Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by4 opinions
- B. Berger Co. v. Contract Interiors, Inc. (In Re Contract Interiors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
- Elbro Knitting Mills v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1929
- Kalamazoo Manufacturing Co. v. AndersonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1989
- Maciak v. OlejniczakDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1948