Legal Opinion
Cyntha J. RESARE, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. RAYTHEON COMPANY, Etc., Defendant, Appellee
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 10, 1992No. 92-1260PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
After a two-day trial on plaintiff Cyntha J. Resare’s sex and age discrimination claims, the district court granted defendant Raytheon Company’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on plaintiff’s sex discrimination claims under both the Rhode Island Fair Employment Practices Act (“FEPA”), R.I.Gen.Laws §§ 28-5-1 et seq. (Supp.1991), and the Rhode Island Civil Rights Act of 1990 (“RICRA”), R.I.Gen. Laws § 42-112-1 et seq. (Supp.1991). 1 During the trial, the district court also ruled that evidence of compensatory damages, absent corroborating medical testimony, was not…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Katz v. City Metal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Center for Behavioral Health, Rhode Island, Inc. v. BarrosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- Invest Almaz v. Temple-Inland Forest Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- Iacampo v. Hasbro, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1996
- Rosa CARDONA JIMENEZ and Charles E. Casellas Rosario, Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. BANCOMERCIO DE PUERTO RICO, Defendant, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.