Legal Opinion
Atlantic MacHinery & Equipment, Inc. v. Tigercat Industries, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided April 14, 2006No. CIV.A. 3:05CV804HEHPublished
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUDSON, District Judge.
(Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Denying Defendant’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment)
This case involves the alleged wrongful termination of a heavy equipment dealership agreement. Plaintiff contends that its dealership agreement with Defendant is unenforceable as written because its provisions are trumped by the Virginia Heavy Equipment Dealer Act (“the Act”), Va. Code. Ann. §§ 59.1-353,-363 (2001 & Supp.2005). The- defendant counters that Plaintiffs volume of inventory does not meet the minimum jurisdictional requirements…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Edgar v. Mite Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.