Legal Opinion
Stauffer v. Remick
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 15, 1887PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from, Barton District Court. The opinion states the facts. Judgment for defendants, at the February Term, 1886. The plaintiff brings the case to this court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Holt, C.:
Plaintiff in error, plaintiff below, filed his petition in the Barton district court, of which the following is a copy, (court and title omitted :)
“The plaintiff, Jacob Stauffer, complains of the defendants, Joseph Remick, James S. Dalziel, and Joshua Clayton and James Clayton, partners as Clayton & Clayton, saying: That on the 15th day of May, 1884, there was tried in the above court a cause entitled Joseph Remick v. Jacob Stauffer, and a verdict was found by the jury against said Jacob Stauffer for the sum of $88.75 and costs; that on the 16th day of May, 1884, an…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Draper v. CowlesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
3Cited by4 opinions
- Shelby v. ZieglerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Lewis v. BarnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
- Kemmerle v. KemmerleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Noble v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896