Legal Opinion
Hudson County Welfare Department v. Roedel (In Re Roedel)
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 7, 1983No. Civ. A. 83-807PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LACEY, District Judge.
Gerald Joseph Roedel, debtor, appeals from an order of the Bankruptcy Court dated January 18, 1983, determining that his debt to the Hudson County Welfare Department (HCWD) for alimony and child support is nondischargeable. The issue on appeal is whether the Bankruptcy Judge erred in applying the law in effect on the date of his decision, or whether the law in effect on another date, such as the date the debtor filed his bankruptcy petition, should govern. 1 Jurisdiction exists pursuant to section 405(c)(1)(C) of the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, Pub.L. 95-598, §…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bradley v. School Bd. of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Usery v. Turner Elkhorn Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Grimesy v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Smith v. Gibbons (In Re Gibbons)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- In Re StroopDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
- In Re GibbonsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- Legreide v. Pulley (In Re Pulley)District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.