Daube v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1DissentLittleton, Judge
I am unable to agree with the conclusion that the filing of a claim for refund prior to the allowance of an overpayment by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is necessary to enable a taxpayer to maintain a suit to recover an amount duly allowed by the Commissioner, pursuant to the provisions of the statute, during the period within which he may do so without the filing of a claim. The cause of action as stated in the petition is based wholly upon the Commissioner’s allowance of overpayments of $10,874.64 and $2,-628.26 for 1918 and 1919, respectively. This allowance, which was made on March…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. KaufmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Meyersdale Fuel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.