Legal Opinion · Dissent

Daube v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 5, 1932No. L-106Published

1DissentLittleton, Judge

I am unable to agree with the conclusion that the filing of a claim for refund prior to the allowance of an overpayment by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue is necessary to enable a taxpayer to maintain a suit to recover an amount duly allowed by the Commissioner, pursuant to the provisions of the statute, during the period within which he may do so without the filing of a claim. The cause of action as stated in the petition is based wholly upon the Commissioner’s allowance of overpayments of $10,874.64 and $2,-628.26 for 1918 and 1919, respectively. This allowance, which was made on March…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. United States v. KaufmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. United States v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Meyersdale Fuel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API