Legal Opinion

United States v. Perry

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided April 9, 1987No. ACMR 8601110PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Judge:

Appellant alleges and government agrees that the military judge erred in adjudging a sentence to forfeitures in excess of the statutory limits for a special court-martial. Appellant further alleges that the convening authority’s action which approves a forfeiture of $625.00 pay per month for 75 days is contrary to Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rule for Courts-Martial 1003(b)(2) which requires that a sentence to forfeitures shall state the exact amount in whole dollars to be forfeited each month, and the number of months the forfeitures…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. GuerreroU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. MullensU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  4. United States v. SimmonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  5. United States v. MullensU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API