United States v. Perry
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
De GIULIO, Judge:
Appellant alleges and government agrees that the military judge erred in adjudging a sentence to forfeitures in excess of the statutory limits for a special court-martial. Appellant further alleges that the convening authority’s action which approves a forfeiture of $625.00 pay per month for 75 days is contrary to Manual for Courts-Martial, United States, 1984, Rule for Courts-Martial 1003(b)(2) which requires that a sentence to forfeitures shall state the exact amount in whole dollars to be forfeited each month, and the number of months the forfeitures…
2Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
- United States v. GuerreroU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. MullensU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. SimmonsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
- United States v. MullensU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.