Legal Opinion

United States v. Mullens

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided June 17, 1987No. ACMR 8600556PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

De GIULIO, Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, appellant was found guilty by a general court-martial composed of officers and enlisted members of driving while intoxicated; two specifications of anal and oral sodomy with his natural son, a child under the age of sixteen years; one specification of indecent acts with his natural daughter, a child under the age of sixteen years; one specification of indecent acts with his natural son and one specification of communicating a threat, in violation of Articles 111, 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter cited…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. ElmoreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  4. United States v. CambridgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. In Re GodleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. MullensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. DeYoungU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. MullensU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
  4. United States v. NeilU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  5. United States v. BerreyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API