United States v. Mullens
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
De GIULIO, Judge:
In accordance with his pleas, appellant was found guilty by a general court-martial composed of officers and enlisted members of driving while intoxicated; two specifications of anal and oral sodomy with his natural son, a child under the age of sixteen years; one specification of indecent acts with his natural daughter, a child under the age of sixteen years; one specification of indecent acts with his natural son and one specification of communicating a threat, in violation of Articles 111, 125 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice [hereinafter cited…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. ElmoreUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. CambridgeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
- In Re GodleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. MullensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. DeYoungU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. MullensU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1987
- United States v. NeilU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. BerreyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1989