Legal Opinion
Hamilton Creek Metropolitan District v. Bondholders Colorado Bondshares (In Re Hamilton Creek Metropolitan District)
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 15, 1998No. 97-1099PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Debtor-Appellant Hamilton Creek Metropolitan District appeals from the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s dismissal of its petition for relief under chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code. Our jurisdiction arises under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d), and we affirm.
Background
Hamilton Creek Metropolitan District is a quasi-municipal corporation in Summit County, Colorado. In 1985, the District issued general obligation bonds in the amount of $2,125,000 to fund a new housing development project. After experiencing financial difficulties from 1987 to 1989, the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- First National Bank v. Woods (In Re Woods)Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Simon v. Amir (In Re Amir)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Mendez v. Salven (In Re Mendez)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In Re RossUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
- Levorsen v. Octapharma Plasma, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.