Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. Malarney

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 7, 1993No. Nos. 91-1003 and 91-1127Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

DIMITROULEAS, WILLIAM P., Associate Judge,

concurring and dissenting.

I concur in the reversal of appellant’s conviction for sexual battery upon a child under the age of twelve. However, I would also hold that the trial court’s reduction of the charge to a life felony was improper, and I would remand this cause for a new trial on the original capital sexual battery charge.

I agree that the exclusion of the Texas defense witness testimony was error. See § 90.803(10), Fla.Stat. (1989); Terranova v. State, 474 So.2d 1206 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); Williams v. State, 406 So.2d 86 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Jones…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Smalis v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Jent v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  4. Glendening v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Commonwealth v. DunkleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API