Mitchell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Certiorari; from Pulton superior court — Judge Pendleton. November 11, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.
The court did not err in sustaining the certiorari and granting a new trial. Fagan v. Jackson, 1 Ga. App. 24 (57 S. E. 901).
2. Allegations in a party’s pleadings áre not ordinarily evidence in his favor. Although the suit between the plaintiff and the garnishee is described in the garnishment proceedings as being based on a judgment against the main defendant, and although the parties, in a statement of facts, agree that this is so — that is, although they agree that the plaintiff’s claim was a proceeding upon a judgment, rather than a proceeding upon an open indebtedness, this does not…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Toole v. Edmondson & Seay Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Fagan v. Jackson & OrmeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
3Cited by5 opinions
- Patrick v. HollidaySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Morris v. City Council of AugustaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
- Lancaster v. RalstonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
- Delinski v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Kelly v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911