Legal Opinion

Delinski v. Dunn

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1951No. 17306PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

In the motion to dismiss the certiorari, it is contended that at the time the certiorari was sanctioned H. T. Brice was not a member of the State Board of Corrections, and not a proper party plaintiff; that “said action constitutes an improper joinder and misjoinder of parties plaintiff, and subjects the said proceeding to dismissal.” The inclusion of the name of H. T. Brice as a member of the State Board of Corrections would not subject the entire proceeding to dismissal. The original petition for habeas corpus named H. T. Brice as a member of the State Board of Corrections.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Bonding & Surety Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Milam v. SproullSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  3. Mitchell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delinski v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  2. Balkcom v. SellersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
  3. Delinski v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API