Delinski v. Dunn
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Head, Justice.
In the motion to dismiss the certiorari, it is contended that at the time the certiorari was sanctioned H. T. Brice was not a member of the State Board of Corrections, and not a proper party plaintiff; that “said action constitutes an improper joinder and misjoinder of parties plaintiff, and subjects the said proceeding to dismissal.” The inclusion of the name of H. T. Brice as a member of the State Board of Corrections would not subject the entire proceeding to dismissal. The original petition for habeas corpus named H. T. Brice as a member of the State Board of Corrections.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American Bonding & Surety Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Milam v. SproullSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
- Mitchell v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Delinski v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Balkcom v. SellersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1964
- Delinski v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954