Legal Opinion

Toole v. Edmondson & Seay Bros.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 19, 1898PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Certiorari. Before Judge Lumpkin. Fulton superior court. September term, 1897.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

A claim to a fund sought to be reached by the process of garnishment was tried in a justice’s court, it being set up that the sum of $34.60 held up by the garnishment.was exempt because earned by the defendant as a laborer in the capacity of a conductor for the garnishee, a street-railway company. On the trial the sole witness introduced was the conductor, who testified as follows: “I am the claimant. I work for the Atlanta Consolidated Street Railway Company. I am *777a conductor. A conductor, before he becomes such, goes through a course of training in the shops of the company, in order to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Oliver v. Macon Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. PittsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
  3. Witkowski v. SkalowskiSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  4. Benton v. HynesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Brown v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Brooks v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  2. Johnston v. Brenau College-ConservatorySupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Harwell v. MarshallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  4. Georgia Coast & Piedmont Railroad v. HerringtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  5. Seagraves v. Powell Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1915

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API