Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. O'Hagan
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 14, 1995No. Civ. No. 3-90-16PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RENNER, Senior District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant O’Hagan’s motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant seeks a stay of judgment until the pending appeal of Defendant’s criminal conviction has been fully determined and until completion of any subsequent appeal he may take from the judgment in this case. Defendant also seeks an amendment to the injunctive portion of the judgment to eliminate nonparties. He has also moved for an order to restrict the scope of this Court’s permanent injunction to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hilton v. BraunskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Madsen v. Women's Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Emich Motors Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Regal Knitwear Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amx, International, Inc., William B. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Burris v. J.P. Morgan Chase & CompanyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
- Richardson v. RichardsonSuperior Court of Guam · 2014
- Schaefer v. PeraltaDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. BeasleyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024