Legal Opinion
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Amx, International, Inc., William B. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 12, 1993No. 92-1376PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Per curiam
The instant case involves the enforcement of a disgorgement order entered by the district court on August 1,1990. The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) appeals an order from the district court denying certain requested relief the SEC claimed was necessary to obtain compliance with the disgorgement order. The SEC filed a Motion to Dispense With Oral Argument and Summarily Reverse the District Court’s Decision, asserting that our recent holding in Sec. Exch. Comm’n v. Huffman, 996 F.2d 800 (5th Cir.1993), is dispositive of the issue presented. We agree, and we reverse and remand the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Local Number 93, International Ass'n of Firefighters v. City of ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Kaspar Wire Works, Inc. v. Leco Engineering and MacHine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Patrick Neal Nerren v. Livingston Police Department Billy Ray Nelson, Sheriff and Bob Key, and Matthew Parrish, and Robert AlstonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Perez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Junerous Cook v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- Laker v. Vallette (In Re Toyota of Jefferson, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.