Legal Opinion

Emanuelson v. Gibbs

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 4, 1980No. 801DC219PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Plaintiff requests a mandatory injunction ordering defendants to remove the posts placed by defendants in the right-of-way of Acorn Lane. Defendants contend they have the right to mark the right-of-way of Acorn Lane on plaintiffs property because plaintiff has no rights in the street. We hold that Acorn Lane is a street dedicated to the public use and that the trial court erred in finding and concluding defendants “have the right to mark the boundary lines of Acorn Lane.”

The record reveals that defendants, developers of Old Oak Estates subdivision, duly recorded a plat showing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Snow v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Owens v. ElliottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Gilbreath v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Tower Development Partners v. ZellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  3. Bumgarner v. ReneauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  4. Whichard v. OliverCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Bumgarner v. ReneauCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API