Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Board of Equalization of Pushmataha County
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided February 28, 1995No. 82441PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOPLIN, Judge:
Andrew Jackson (Jackson or Appellant) seeks review of the trial court’s order affirming a decision of the Board of Equalization of Pushmataha County (Board or Appellee) denying Jackson’s request for reduction of assessed value of Jackson’s property due to alleged creosote contamination of the land and water supply. In this appeal, Jackson asserts the trial court erred in affirming the Board decision, (1) only two of the three members of Board present at time of hearing on Appellant’s application, (2) one of two Board members present disqualified to hear…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamid v. Sew OriginalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Sneed v. SneedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Funnell v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Peters v. Golden Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Harvey v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Matthews v. FunckCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
- Affordable Residential Communities 7, L.L.C. v. Canadian County AssessorCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2006
- Park East Ltd. Co. v. GordonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2003
- Cimmarron Transportation, LLC v. HeavnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- American Southwest Properties, Inc. v. Tulsa County Board of EqualizationCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014