Legal Opinion

Islami v. Needham

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 25, 1995No. 94-P-642PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtIreland, J.

We are asked to determine whether language in the plaintiff’s complaint “demand [ing] judgment ... in an amount to be determined by a jury,” without more, is sufficient to preserve his right under G. L. c. 231, § 103, to remove his case from the District Court, where the action was commenced, to the Superior Court for a jury trial there.

The plaintiff filed a complaint for damages in a District Court in Essex County naming the two defendants in separate counts. A jury trial of a civil matter so filed is available *443by statute. G. L. c. 218, § 19B. The plaintiffs claim arose from a motor vehicle…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Higgins v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Walcott v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  3. Shields v. LeBrechtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Beaulieu v. BellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. Hickey v. GrandineMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
  3. CMJ Management Co. v. WilkersonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2017
  4. Mass. Auto Body, Inc. v. FurmanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. KresslerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API