Legal Opinion

Mass. Auto Body, Inc. v. Furman

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided May 24, 2004Published

1Opinion of the CourtRutberg, J.

This is an expedited appeal from the motion judge’s consolidation of these matters for trial and his subsequent denial of a motion to reconsider his order to consolidate. Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A., Rule 16(a)(4).

Factual Background

A tacit agreement to exchange accounting services for automobile repairs between Edwin Furman, a C.RA, and Mass. Auto Body, Inc. that began in 1997 appears to underlie these actions.1 In late 1998, Furman brought his wife’s [“Lynne Garafalo”] Mercedes Benz to Mass. Auto Body; and, Raymond Daher suggested that Furman might want to trade his wife’s car for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foreign Auto Import, Inc. v. Renault Northeast, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Higgins v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Islami v. NeedhamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API