Legal Opinion

Beaulieu v. Bell

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 19, 1996No. 95-P-425PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

We think the amendment made by St. 1987, c. 251, § 1, to G. L. c. 231, § 103, requires that a plaintiff who initiates a civil action in a District Court claiming more than $25,000, and who desires to preserve the right later to claim a jury trial in the Superior Court, must, within thirty days of the commencement of the action, file with the clerk of the *146District Court a claim of jury trial in the Superior Court.3 Failing that, the plaintiff shall have waived the right to a Superior Court jury trial and cannot regain it, even though the defendant preserved rights to a Superior Court jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bender v. Automotive Specialties, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Dwyer v. PiccicutoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
  3. Islami v. NeedhamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995
  4. Haddad v. PulaskiMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1994
  5. Thayer v. Clerk of the District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. SpatesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
  2. Zarrilli v. Sandoz Pharmaceutical Corp.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  3. Hickey v. GrandineMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
  4. Lavin v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1998
  5. Mandeville v. National Amusements, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API