Legal Opinion
Maryland v. Rolen
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided September 17, 1954No. 6303PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMSEN, District Judge.
Applicants for intervention, citizens of Maryland, seek to intervene as parties plaintiff in a negligence action pending in this court, in which the jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship and the defendants are also citizens of Maryland.
*87It appears from the original complaint and from the motion to intervene that Frederick Joseph Carnesdale and Florence Auld Cerwensky, passengers in an automobile owned by one of the defendants and operated by the other defendant, were killed and injured respectively as a result of the alleged negligence of the driver.
State of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stewart v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Kendrick v. KendrickCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. Carolina Peanut Co. Virginia Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Carolina Peanut Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Johnson v. Riverland Levee Dist.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Frank J. Kozak v. Willard B. Wells, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- TPI Corp. v. Merchandise Mart of South Carolina, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Isbrandtsen Co. v. S. S. Kokoh MaruDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Glens Falls Insurance v. Cook Bros.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1959
- Curtis v. American Book Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1955
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.