Legal Opinion

Vaught v. A.O. Hardee & Sons, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 28, 2005No. 26073PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice BURNETT:

James B. Vaught, individually and as trustee for several relatives (Appellants), raises the issue of whether the trial court erred in excluding evidence of replacement costs as part of the measure of damages for destroyed noncommercial trees. We certified this case for review from the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR, and conclude the trial court erred in excluding evidence of the measure of damages. We reverse and remand for a new trial.

FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Appellants own a 754-acre tract of land in Horry County which they use primarily for hunting and…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. PleasantSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Clark v. CantrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  4. Heninger v. DunnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  5. Hanahan v. SimpsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. ByersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. State v. CommanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. State v. LylesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. MartucciCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. George E. Morabit v. Dennis HoagSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API