Legal Opinion

Holgate v. Workmens Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 17, 1987No. Appeal, 1301 C.D. 1984PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge MacPhail,

Frederick H. Holgate (Petitioner) has filed a petition for review in which the sole issue raised is whether the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) and referee correctly decided that the Police and Fire Medical Association (Association) has no subrogation rights under Section 319 of The Pennsylvania Workmens Compensation Act (Act), 1 77 P.S. §671. We vacate and remand.

Petitioner, who worked for twenty-six years for the City of Philadelphia (Employer) as a fire fighter, filed a claim petition for compensation on December 2, 1982 in which he alleged that he was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Olin Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Branch Motor ExpressCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Frymiare v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Baierl Chevrolet v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. Lamberson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Bucyrus-Erie Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Baierl Chevrolet v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API