Legal Opinion

Baierl Chevrolet v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 22, 1992No. 1853 C.D. 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

149 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 367 (1992)

613 A.2d 132

BAIERL CHEVROLET, Petitioner,

v.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEAL BOARD (SCHUBERT), Respondent.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Submitted April 16, 1992.

July 22, 1992.

Fred C. Trenor and David F. Ryan, for petitioner.

Alexander J. Pentecost, for respondent.

Before McGINLEY and FRIEDMAN, JJ., and SILVESTRI, Senior Judge.

SILVESTRI, Senior Judge.

This is an appeal by Baierl Chevrolet (Employer) from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee's determination that Pennsylvania Blue Cross/Blue Shield (Blue Shield)…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Travelers Insurance v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. General Tire & Rubber Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Humphrey v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Olivetti Corp. of AmericaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API