State ex rel. Burton v. Greater Portsmouth Growth Corp.

Relator raises several questions in this action. His basic contention is that this amendment is invalid because it was not properly submitted to the voters.

He argues first that Section 13, Article VIII, contains more than one amendment within the meaning of Section 1, Article XYI of the Constitution of Ohio, which requires that amendments be submitted separately.

Section 1, Article XVI, reads in part as follows:

“When more than one amendment shall be submitted at the same time, they shall be so submitted as to enable the electors to vote on each amendment, separately.”

It is relator’s contention…