Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Foreman v. Brown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1967No. 40903PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaft, C. J.

It is first contended that there can be no special election on May 2, 1967, because such election has not been validly called.1

Admittedly, Amended Substitute House Joint Resolution No. 22 by its words specifically calls a special election on May 2, 1967, for submission of the proposed Ohio Bond Commission Constitutional Amendment.

In support of the contention that no special election was validly called for May 2, 1967, it is contended (1) that a special election can only be provided for by statute; (2) that no statute provides for a special election on a proposed constitutional *141amendment on…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Elder v. SoursSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
  2. Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State ex rel. Hudd v. TimmeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. State ex rel. Hay v. AldersonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. State Ex Rel. Kemp v. City of Baton RougeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Common Cause v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. State ex rel. Willke v. TaftOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kahalekai v. DoiHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Liberty Council v. BrunnerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State Ex Rel. Voters First v. Ohio Ballot BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API