Legal Opinion

Pendleton v. Cilley

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1978No. 13159PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.

Appellant, Juanita Pendleton, seeks reversal of a summary judgment entered in favor of Dr. Ronald M. Cilley and Carolyn Joy Cilley on her complaint charging medical malpractice. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 47(e), 17A A.R.S. Rules of the Supreme Court. Judgment affirmed.

In determining whether summary judgment should have been granted, a reviewing court considers the matters presented in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. Hall v. Motorists Insurance Corporation, 109 Ariz. 334, 509 P.2d 604 (1973). So viewing the facts, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Valley National Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Boyce v. BrownArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Riedisser v. NelsonArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Stevens v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Hall v. Motorists Insurance CorporationArizona Supreme Court · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Walski v. TiesengaIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Nicoletti v. Westcor, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Contempo Construction Co. v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  4. Deutsche Credit Corp. v. Case Power & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. Gorney v. MeaneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API