Legal Opinion

Newland v. Overland Express, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1980No. 50034PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

The plaintiffs, Alert and Geraldine New-land, brought suit against Overland Express, Inc. and Charles Stark to recover damages for injuries sustained by Mr. New-land. Overland appeals from the order of the Hennepin County District Court granting the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment and striking defendants’ asserted defense that plaintiffs’ sole remedy was provided by the Workers’ Compensation Act. We affirm.

Plaintiff Newland, a truck driver, was asleep in the sleeper cab of a semi-tractor truck being driven by defendant Stark when Stark apparently lost control of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McCourtie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. Guhlke v. Roberts Truck LinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Danek v. Meldrum Manufacturing & Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Turner v. Schumacher Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Hansen v. AdentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Peterson v. KludtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  2. Olsen v. KlingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Hix v. Minnesota Workers' Compensation Assigned Risk PlanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. Mervin v. Magney Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Damgaard v. Avera HealthDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API