Legal Opinion

Hamtramck Lumber & Supply Co. v. United Home Builders

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1923No. Docket No. 71PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

The original bill herein was filed by plaintiff to enforce a lien for material furnished in the construction of three houses. Other lienors, subsequent purchasers of the property, the principal contractor and the surety on a bond to release the liens, were made defendants.

May 10, 1919, Andrew J. Tarsney was the owner of three lots on Emerson avenue in the city of Detroit, *267and on that day made a verbal agreement with the United Home Builders, Inc., for the erection of three residences thereon at $5,300 each, and paid $1,000. July 1, 1919, the agreement was. reduced to writing and signed by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smalley v. GearingMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Stevens v. GarlandMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  4. J. W. McCausey & Co. v. GittlemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Corlett-Stone Lumber Co. v. ParkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Frank Japes Co. v. Pagel.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API