Legal Opinion
Sanders v. Amerimed, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 25, 2014No. Case No. 1:13-cv-813PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS (Doc. 9)
TIMOTHY S. BLACK, District Judge.
This civil action is before the Court on Defendant’s partial motion to dismiss (Doc. 9) and the parties’ responsive memoranda (Docs. 11,15).
I. FACTS AS ALLEGED BY THE PLAINTIFF
For purposes of this motion to dismiss, the Court must: (1) view the complaint in the light most favorable to the Plaintiff; and (2) take all well-pleaded factual allegations as true. Tackett v. M & G Polymers, 561 F.3d 478, 488 (6th Cir.2009).
Amerimed employs both part-time and full-time pharmacists. (Doc. 1 at ¶¶ 8, 12). On or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Naim Vijdani v. John Mattos, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026