Legal Opinion
Naim Vijdani v. John Mattos, et al.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided February 27, 2026No. 2:25-cv-02496Unknown
1Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 NAIM VIJDANI, 4 Petitioner, Case No.: 2:25-cv-02496-GMN-EJY 5 vs. ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR 6 JOHN MATTOS, et al., WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS 7 Respondents. 8 9 Pending before the Court is Petitioner Naim Vijdani’s Amended Petition for Habeas 10 Corpus Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, (ECF No. 9). Federal Respondents Michael Bernacke, 11 Todd Lyons, Kristi Noem, Pamela Bondi, and Kerri Quihuis filed a Response, (ECF No. 21). 12 Respondent John Mattos also filed a Response, (ECF No. 17). Petitioner replied, (ECF No. 13 22). For the reasons…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Jennings v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.