Legal Opinion
Bradley v. Pace
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 15, 1950No. 10307_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.
The parties to this appeal recently appeared here in Pace v. Bradley, which we disposed of by an opinion reported in 1948, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 212, 171 F.2d 350. We shall summarize the earlier proceeding in order that the questions now before us, which relate thereto, may be understood.
One Florence J. Livingston died leaving a will which was somewhat ambiguous. In one clause she mentioned her sister, Ida J. Bailey, and her niece, Lavinia A. Wohlfarth, as equal beneficiaries, adding that “at the death of my sister, her share will go to her daughter Florence B.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hill v. HawesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- King Bridge Co. v. Otoe CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Osborn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
- Stradford v. WagnerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Hill v. HawesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Randolph v. RandolphCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Frank Gunther Et Ux. And Ethel and Oscar Heath v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
- Slater v. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
- Ruth Whitehead v. American Security and Trust Company, American Security and Trust Company v. Ned Whitehead, and Whitehead and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- The Dayton Power and Light Company v. Federal Power Commission, Ohio Fuel Gas Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.