Legal Opinion
Nagel v. P & M Distributors, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 21, 1969No. Civ. 33300PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
On November 2, 1965, plaintiff filed suit against defendant P & M Distributors, Inc., a New York corporation, for damages for breach of contract, monies owed, reasonable value of services and for an accounting. According to declaration of service executed by Robert H. Odenthal on November 29,1965, defendant corporation was served by serving Ulf Ljungberg on November 29, 1965, with copy of summons and complaint pursuant to section 410, Code of Civil Procedure. No appearance having been made by defendant, plaintiff on March 10, 1966, made request for entry of default; it was denied because…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Forbes v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- Texas Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Cosper v. Smith & Wesson Arms Co.California Supreme Court · 1959
- Hayashi v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Dill v. Berquist Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Lovret v. SeyfarthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Plotitsa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Manson, Iver & York v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Stevenson v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.