Legal Opinion

Cummins v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided July 17, 2006No. 2005-1482Published

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 05-1482 CUMMINS INCORPORATED (formerly known as Cummins Engine Company), Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. Lawrence M. Friedman, Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were David G. Forgue and Ilya A. Bakke. Barbara S. Williams, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appellee. With her on the brief were Peter…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Universal Electronics Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API