Legal Opinion
Dickau v. Town of Glastonbury
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 7, 1968PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The plaintiffs have appealed from the valuation placed upon certain of their real estate for tax purposes in Glastonbury. Their original complaint was in two counts. The first count was in the form of an appeal from the action of the board of tax review in refusing to reduce the allegedly excessive valuation placed by the assessors on five described parcels of land. The second count alleged that the plaintiffs had applied, under General Statutes (Rev. to 1964) § 12-107c, to have these parcels classified as farmland; that the assessors made no such classification but stated that the assessment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- MacKay v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Burritt Mutual Savings Bank v. City of New BritainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Pet Car Products, Inc. v. BarnettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Linahan v. LinahanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Hebb v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Bozzi v. BozziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Hutensky v. Town of AvonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- O'BRIEN v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Emerick v. EmerickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
- Jensen v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.