City of Versailles v. Kentucky Highland Railroad
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
'Appeal from Woodford Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Settle
Affirming.
This -action was instituted by appellee and an injunction obtained by it to prevent the enforcement by appel*84lant of an alleged void ordinance, passed by its board of council, and to prevent prosecutions threatened against appellee for failing to comply with its provisions. The ordinance in question reads as follows:
“Be It Ordained, By the Board of Council of the City of Versailles,
“Section 1. That any and all persons, companies or corporations owning, possessing, operating or having charge, or control of a railroad passing into or through any…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Pearsall v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- State v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Boyd v. Board of CouncilCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
- Town of LaGrange v. OverstreetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jones, Chief Safety Inspector v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Jones v. RussellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1928
- City of Mt. Sterling v. Donaldson Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
- Sallsbury v. Equitable Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Schoening v. Paducah Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.