Legal Opinion

Sallsbury v. Equitable Purchasing Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 23, 1917PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Boyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

— Affirming.

This suit brought by the appellee in the Boyd circuit court challenges the validity of an ordinance passed by the city council of the city of Ashland on February 1, 1915. The sections of the ordinance imposing the burdens complained of are numbers 1 and 2, they being as follows:

“Section I. That every person, firm or corporation engaged in the business of lending or advancing money (or negotiation for the lending or advancing money) on assignments of salaries or wages, due or to become due or discounting salaries or wages due or to become due,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Bell's Gap Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Hager v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
  4. Ragland v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
  5. Fiscal Court Owen Co. v. F. & A. Cox Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. SebreeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  2. Martin, Comr. of Revenue v. Nocero Ice Cream Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. Ziedman & Pollie, Inc. v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. City of Wilmore v. McCrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. J. & A. Freiberg Co. v. DawsonDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API