Schoening v. Paducah Water Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Commissioner Stanley—
Affirming'.
This suit was filed by the appellants A. H. Seheoning and Thomas B. Bussell, and another who withdrew, as citizens and taxpayers of the city of Paducah and patrons of the appellee Paducah Water Company, for themselves and others of the class, against the city and the company. They attack the validity of an ordinance enacted May 22,1925, creating and providing for the sale of a franchise for the operation of public waterworks and of certain amendatory ordinances enacted after the sale of the franchise to the Paducah Water Company. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gathright v. H. M. Byllesby & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Fox v. LantripCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Williams ex rel. Pike County v. StallardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
- Louisville Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. Louisville Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Cox v. City of CynthianaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Barry v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1940
- Schultz v. Town of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Taylor, County Jailer v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Steele v. Clinton Electric Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Carrico v. City of OwensboroCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.